jump to navigation

Michel Goossens: From Time Magazine 1982 to CloudBees June 12, 2012

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
1 comment so far

8 years ago, as I was JBoss’ GM Europe, David Skok introduced me to Michel Goossens with whom he had worked while at Silverstream. Following that introduction, Marc and I met Michel at Javapolis in Antwerp, that was at the end of 2004.

I remember Michel telling us his story, how he started his career as a pilot, how he had to emigrate to Africa to keep his license given how bad the flight industry was in Europe in the early 80’s, how he was then flying highly priced horses from rich farmers around Africa, from competition to competition and how, when he came back to Europe, he was struck by the 1982 Time’s magazine “Person of the Year”: The Computer. This made him realize Computers would get big, so he decided to go back at the university, learn what computers were about while taking his first job in IT.

Fast forward and 20 years after, Michel and I started working together at JBoss and had some real fun. After JBoss’ acquisition by Red Hat, Michel built Red Hat middleware overlay salesforce and moved on to join Magento, which was later acquired by E-Bay.

During all of those years, Michel and I have kept in touch and when I started CloudBees in 2010, Michel invested in CloudBees as part of our Series-A. 20 months after that, CloudBees’ European business is booming and I approached Michel to see if he was up for some more fun and was willing to put his time where his money is. And he was.

Consequently, I am very honored to announce that Michel has joined CloudBees as VP Sales Europe.

Welcome Michel! Onward,

Sacha

Amazon 1 – Microsoft 0 January 16, 2012

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
add a comment

The cloud is redefining the IT industry as we’ve known it. Amazon’s recent announcement to provide free Windows micro-instances on EC2 is another event that underscores this revolution occurring from the move to the cloud and how even a giant like Microsoft has probably been forced in such a move.

However, I see several roadblocks to truly leveraging “free” on EC2 with the Windows platform. Let’s explore this further… For as long as IaaS providers have existed, using a Windows machine has always been more expensive than using a Linux machine. As an illustration, you can see below the current prices for Amazon Web Services and Rackspace, two leading IaaS providers.

Rackspace Pricing
Amazon EC2 pricing

Using Microsoft Windows is about 33% to 40% more expensive than running Linux in the cloud (from just a per-hour pricing). Note that at that price point, in both cases you are not going to get support from any vendor (you would have to either get support from Microsoft for Windows or pay for a Linux subscription from Red Hat or another provider). This leads to several observations.

First, this demonstrates that current software licensed-based business models are ill-suited for the cloud. In order to be competitive, cloud providers are looking for ways to scale their business at the lowest possible cost, which, most of the time, means they’ll always prefer relying on Open Source software if it is feature-competitive with its proprietary counterparts. At the infrastructure layer, this is almost always true: virtualization, routing, firewall, load-balancing, storage, DNS, SSL, etc. are king in Open Source land. This makes it very hard for vendors like Microsoft and even VMware to remain competitive when up against cloud-providers’ offerings aimed at commoditizing the market. Consequently, in the new cloud era, especially at the infrastructure layer, either you are able to provide a full-fledge SERVICE offering (that is the “S” in “XaaS”) that can be packaged in a way that makes sense to your market, or times will be hard, very hard.

While this post focuses on Microsoft, it doesn’t mean that things will necessarily be rosier for Open Source vendors down the road. Let’s open a quick parenthesis on this aspect. Once a cloud provider has decided to move with Open Source software, the next question is whether they need to rely on a third-party company to get support for that open source components they are using? While they might need help initially, providers will typically have grown the required expertise in-house as they expand, with no need for a high-friction process involving a third-party vendor. Furthermore, since their infrastructure is very homogeneous (hundreds of thousands of identical servers!), they can support their open source software at a much lower price point than any generic subscription provider ever could: they do not have to run gazillions of tests on gazillions of different motherboards, chipset, LAN cards, controllers, disks, CPU, etc. Their domain problem isn’t a problem – as their infrastructure is hyper-focused. This point is illustrated by the recent launch of Amazon’s own Linux distribution, based on RHEL/CentOS: Amazon Linux. Not only is support for that version of Linux provided as part of the default IaaS support cost (and as we know, FREE is a tough price point to beat), but it probably saves costs to Amazon since those customers are using a stack that Amazon understands extremely well, hence reducing the probability of hard-to-diagnose support tickets.

The bottom line is that any infrastructure subscription/license business, open source or proprietary, is a hard business in the cloud era.

But let’s go back to our point with regard to Microsoft Windows. So, Windows is not only up to 40% more expensive to run in the cloud, but the tools available to build a Windows AMI (vs. a Linux AMI), customize it, provision it, build a JEOS (Just Enough OS) are much weaker on Windows than on Linux. Anybody who has tried to properly automate the usage of Windows and Linux in the cloud will tell you that none of this is trivial, and that Windows is particularly hard. Second roadblock to Windows’ adoption in the cloud: Windows’ cloud DNA is weak, very weak.

Let’s pursue on the on-ramping of new cloud users. About a year ago, Amazon launched their “free usage tier” offering. The idea was to provide free compute capacity to new subscribers so they could experience and learn the cloud at no cost. Yet, because this was a free offering, it was only made available for Linux-based AMIs. This meant that for about a year, tens of thousands of developers, DevOps, sys admins, etc. have learned how to use the cloud on Linux, not on Windows. Third roadblock: Windows is not a good candidate for on-ramping new users to the cloud, both for technical and pricing reasons.

Microsoft has probably tried to ignore this for while but this wasn’t sustainable: Amazon announced today that Windows is now also eligible on these free tier instances. For this to happen, MSFT probably had to provide free pass-through licenses to Amazon for that very purpose and maybe even more as this is really a way for Microsoft to tap into AWS’s on-ramping funnel. As we all well know, whenever we read “Microsoft Windows” and “free” in the same sentence, we know that something big had to force that situation.One last roadblock? Well, now you can try to do something meaningful on Windows with 613MB of RAM, which is what AWS’ free micro instances provide…

The cloud is redefining the IT industry as we’ve known it and re-shuffling power among vendors. This is an opportunity for new entrants such as CloudBees to make a difference as well as for dominant positions to shift base. My humble opinion? Amazon will become the new Microsoft and today’s news might be one of the first symbolic events that signal that shift. It will be very hard for Microsoft to turn their ship in a new direction.

Oh, and remember, you can test whatever the cloud revolution means to you, as a Java Developer, on the CloudBees PaaS. Just try us for free! ;)

Onward,

Sacha

CloudBees Wins a Perfect Trifecta! January 10, 2012

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
add a comment

I always start the New Year with plenty of well-intended resolutions. Never mind, most of them don’t last: as soon as I start hitting the post-break reality, resolutions seems harder to satisfy, exceptions to whatever I have committed to seem to stack up and, oh well…maybe next year.

For now, the same logic doesn’t seem to apply at CloudBees. Here’s why.

In 2010, we committed to ourselves that in 2011 we would offer the first end-to-end, development-to-production Java PaaS in GA. Last year, in January 2011, we announced the first end-to-end, development-to-production, Java PaaS in GA. That was a great way to start the year — without breaking an important New Years resolution.

In 2011, we committed to aggressively communicating to the industry who CloudBees is and what we offer. We did just that. As if it was a mirror image of January 2011, this January–in just a few days—also saw that resolution come to be! In just a few days, CloudBees received three awards!

The first one was NetworkWorld, who recognized CloudBees as one of “9 hot technology startups to watch in 2012.” Wow – not bad for a one-year old company!

The next day, Dr. Dobbs announced the JOLT Awards. CloudBees received an Honorable Mention and, according to Executive Editor Andrew Binstock, “…CloudBees was included for special distinction because we strongly feel it indicates an important new direction in coding.”

Finally, last but not least, today we received an “InfoWorld 2012 Technology of the Year Award,” placing us in good company with products such as … Amazon Web Services, the iPad, Apple Siri, MacBook Air, etc. You can also read the press release we issued today.

With such a great start, I have a very good feeling about CloudBees in 2012…and, I can’t wait to see what NEXT January may also bring! After all, good things happen in threes…

Onward,

Sacha

CloudBees Running for a JCP Executive Committee Seat! October 20, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
add a comment

At CloudBees, we are convinced that the cloud is the new platform; the platform where most of the workloads will end up running. This is a big fundamental shift in IT, one of those shifts that you only see once every two decades or so.

To navigate successfully through that transition, languages, frameworks, vendors, etc. have to adapt to that new paradigm. To quote General Erik Shineski (I tend not to quote Generals much, so please bear with me): “If you don’t like change, you’re going to like irrelevance even less.

For that reason, here at CloudBees, we have decided to step up and run for a JCP EC seat. We think Java needs to go through some important changes, including:

read more here…

What a week! JUC, JavaOne, TAB & more… October 10, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
add a comment

My Family in the Alps (this obviously includes our cat)Last week was phenomenal in intensity: first we had the Jenkins User Conference (JUC), for which CloudBees was the platinum sponsor and key organizer. JUC was immediately followed by JavaOne and CloudBees’ semi-annual Technical Advisory Board (TAB) meeting. In between planning and execution of all of these activities a number of very important press releases were issued, along with associated media and analyst briefings.

Today it is Friday. I am back in Switzerland and it just started snowing: the perfect conditions to provide a moment for me to sit down, look back, reflect and appreciate…

Read more on the CloudBees blog…

ORCL and the Cloud: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly October 7, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

In what was probably Larry’s second hardest thing to go through (after losing against Alinghi during the finals of the 2003 Louis Vuitton Cup), ORCL finally joined the cloud reality.

Let’s go through the good, the bad and the ugly in what ORCL announced…

The Good

Larry has long been in denial about the cloud: this stance was not sustainable anymore. As a matter of fact, ORCL was the last major IT company to still resist the obvious: the cloud is here to stay – and it is thriving. If ORCL hadn’t changed course, they were truly facing a risk that their application, middleware and infrastructure businesses would be ripped apart by fast growing and much more agile SaaS, PaaS and IaaS vendors – and this in probably less than half a decade.

But Larry is a wise businessman and he certainly has no intent to lead his venerable company to the “elephants’ graveyard.” Consequently, ORCL made it clear today that they intend to play a significant role in the cloud at all levels: IaaS, PaaS and SaaS.

HP, Microsoft and to a (much) lesser extent, IBM had already laid out a cloud strategy and had started executing on it. ORCL was the last fortress to resist and their stance had probably been cited by a number of CIOs as an argument to justify their own resistance to the cloud. Those days are now over and all of the largest enterprise IT vendors have clearly sent the message that the cloud is the new platform. ORCL joining the fray is a greatly symbolic step forward for the cloud.


The Bad

The problem is that if you take a closer look at ORCL’s current cloud offering you’ll quickly realize that ORCL is not really moving into the cloud, it is more…moving the cloud into ORCL.

You want to pay as you go? You want elasticity? You want on-demand? Fine. ORCL’s current cloud offering is essentially a repackaged vertical stack of the good-old ORCL you’ve always known; they’ve simply made it possible to consume it in a cloudish way. We are still far away from the generic cloud infrastructure offering of an Amazon AWS, a true cloud platform à la CloudBees or a multi-tenant application offering à la Salesforce.com. Welcome [b|h]ack to the ASP model by the hour, welcome to 1996.

My gut tells me that ORCL’s customers won’t be satisfied with such a vertically-closed view of the cloud. ORCL will have to do better much better. But it takes more than a snap of the fingers to move such a large ship towards a new paradigm, so let’s give ORCL some time, the benefit of the doubt and let’s see how they execute.

The Ugly

The reality is that despite ORCL’s efforts to enter the space, and independently of their technical offering, it will be very hard for ORCL to incentivize their sales force to drive any meaningful cloud sales.

In order to be successful, their cloud solution would have to be better, faster and cheaper than their current offerings.

ORCL’s offering, as we have seen, is currently no way better or faster: being a mere hosting offering of their current products, it doesn’t provide any meaningful value-add and it is unlikely to generate a gold rush-like stampede to ORCL’s cloud platform.

As for the cheaper part, I doubt ORCL will convert their very-high, per-CPU prices into marketplace give-aways just because the cloud is cool.

ORCL’s prices will either have to be compatible with their current pricing scheme and level – which means absolutely non-competitive with the cloud offerings out there – or aggressively priced, hence in complete competition with their own sales force.

The fundamental question for many entrenched software vendors trying to enter the cloud is how can they incent their sales force to move away from highly priced, multi-year upfront licenses deals, in favor of pay-as-you-go, pay-what-you-need, self-service offerings, in complete disruption of their current account-level or territory-based sales model. This will be hard to swallow and a tough selling transition to make.

Conclusion

As the last major IT vendor to commit to the cloud, ORCL closed the introductory chapter of its cloud story this week.

Ten years ago, it was less and less sustainable for companies not to have a clear open source strategy in order to i) protect their IP, and ii) increase their productivity. The exact same thing is true today with the cloud: now is the time to embrace the future.

Welcome to the cloud era, Oracle!

Onward,

Sacha

Steve Harris join CloudBees as SVP of Products September 27, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
2 comments

One of CloudBees’ top priorities for 2011 was to build a seasoned executive team. This led to Jim McLoughlin (from Appirio) joining as VP of Sales, André Pino (from Forrester) joining as VP of Marketing and John Vigeant (from Citrix) joining as VP of Business Development.

One of the critical hires we still had to execute on was to recruit a strong product leader. We were looking for somebody with a strong understanding of the middleware market, of Java and of what developers’ and enterprises’ aspirations are.

Today I am proud to announce that Steve Harris is joining the team as CloudBees’ SVP of Products. Steve was seen by many as “Mr. Java” at ORCL and a truly respected individual for his hard work, management style and leadership. Everybody I’ve talked to only had great things to say about Steve: engineers, peers, partners and competitors. Steve went through the Oracle AS era, the BEA acquisition and then the SUN acquisition, with both the Weblogic and Glassfish teams under his leadership.

Steve starts at a great time to ramp up at neutrinos speed: he will attend the Jenkins User Conference this coming Sunday, be present at the CloudBees booth at JavaOne next week and drive our Technical advisory Board (TAB) in Menlo Park next Tuesday.

Welcome Steve, onward,

Sacha

P.S.: you can see a recent presentation from Steve here.

Recent Google App Engine News: Think Beyond Pricing… September 6, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
add a comment

Shortly after going GA with Google App Engine (GAE), Google announced a new pricing scheme a few days back.

This new scheme has generated lots of heat and anger, with some GAE customers estimating their monthly cost will grow from US $8,800 to an estimated US $20,000.

To me, this turn of events leads to several observations:

Read more here…

CloudBees raises Series-B from LightSpeed Venture Partners July 25, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
2 comments

Sometimes, you can’t be sure why, everything seems to go wrong. Wrong timing, wrong sequence, wrong ideas, wrong team. Just all wrong.

And sometimes, things seem to unfold perfectly: the team is great, the chemistry happens, the ideas are good, the timing is right. Not that hard work is not required or that you don’t mistakes, but even those seem to have a purpose.

For now, CloudBees seems to fit in that second category. We launched the company 16 months ago, have raised 4m USD last year from Matrix Partners and the incomparable David Skok, joined forces with two great companies (InfraDNA and Stax Networks) and released the only Java PaaS that covers the complete application lifecycle, from development to production, in GA, with full support for SaaS partners as part of the platform. In the meantime, the team has grown from 5 to 27 and we will be opening our first office in Boston this week, which will primarily be serving as the mothership for our sales and marketing team – our engineering team being mostly located somewhere else on Earth.

While it is typically pretty hard to have any kind of certainty in this type of context, I have two: i) the PaaS market is going to be incredibly big and strategic and ii) it is unclear at what point it will fully trigger. And the timing won’t just depend on CloudBees delivering on a great platform and great customer service, it will also depend on a large number of external factors: confidence in public cloud infrastructure, viral effects around cloud-based deployment, messaging and investment of the leading software vendors towards the cloud, adoption of SaaS solutions, type of new applications being deployed, growth of the mobile applications market, (reduced-)IT spending, world’s economy, etc.

Consequently, the right thing we can do at CloudBees is to keep innovating, flawlessly deliver on quality releases and top service and aim for the long term. More of the same essentially.

To that end, we had in mind to raise a second round of funding later this year. That was the plan at least. It was without counting on a high-energy and talented investor, John Vrionis from Lightspeed Venture Partners who pinged me some time ago: he told me he had essentially done a lot of research, carefully studied this market, and he wanted to be part of the CloudBees adventure. He liked the market, the team, the approach and thought we needed to be equipped to do what is right for the company, resource-wise and time-wise.

As we got to know each other better, we obviously performed our due-diligence and checked on John’s references. My dream is that if 10 years from now I get reference checked, I would like to get 10% of the positive feedback that John got. We were looking for a West Coast VC that would not merely sit on the board but would be part of the team, dedicate time, energy, frustration, joy and neurons to CloudBees and obviously understand what’s happening in the cloud.

As a result of this a deal was sealed and Lightspeed Venture Partners agreed to invest 10.5m USD in CloudBees, along with Matrix Partners.

Welcome John. Onward,

Sacha

P.S.: original post is on CloudBees’ blog.

CloudBees Ecosystem Launch – Discover CloudBees^2 June 29, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
add a comment

Last week at CloudBees, we have released our CloudBees Ecosystem program. As traditional ISVs morph into SaaS vendors, you will start seeing more and more of them aggregating around leading PaaS vendors, as a way to reach out to developers. This also enables PaaS vendors to provide their developers with a great tool box, nicely integrated with the platform.

I am very proud that CloudBees is the first Java PaaS to provide such an ecosystem, comforting us as the innovation leader in that space.

You can read more on my blog entry at CloudBees. Onward,

Sacha

Vote for CloudBees June 3, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
add a comment

Vote for CloudBees to win the JAX Award: http://vote.jax-awards.com/

Thanks :)

What is a PaaS after all? March 30, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, IT.
Tags:
1 comment so far

I’ve just written a blog on what I think is a major differentiators between two families of PaaS out there: the infrastructure-centric PaaS vs. the application-centric PaaS.

Summary: you really want to use one in the second category.

Enjoy!

Hudson is now Jenkins January 31, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags: , , ,
2 comments

After some passionated discussions, the Hudson community has voted and accepted by more than 93% of positive votes to rebrand the project to “Jenkins”.

A three-persons interim board has been setup to further formalize the development processes and architecture of Jenkins. One of those seats has been offered to ORCL, but it seems they’ve declined it. The idea is to setup proper board elections in a few months, once the dust has settled.

Let me restate that while CloudBees is an important contributor to the Jenkins project, we have no intent to “take ownership” of that project: we won’t own its trademark, nor will we request contributors to assign a copyright license to CloudBees. Decisions about the Jenkins project will take place through its board and community. We certainly invite companies interested in Jenkins to join the community – and that includes ORCL. I’ve already received e-mails of companies indicating their intent to start working or to keep working with the Jenkins community.

The Jenkins community is an equal playing field project, code speaks.

Onward,

 

Sacha

Java in the cloud: Amazon joins the party January 19, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
1 comment so far

Amazon announced today its Elastic Beanstalk offering, essentially providing Java in the cloud. This is great news as it reinforces the message that the future of Java is in the cloud, not on premise.

Yet, beyond the signal it sends to the market, this move doesn’t radically change the current situation. If you are a Java developer, you will find that CloudBees is a more mature and more sophisticated offering. CloudBees is a global platform, from dev to production, which will shield you from IT entirely.

Let’s dig more into how CloudBees’ vision differs from AWS’.

More on CloudBees’s blog…

Webinar: 7 Ways to Optimize Hudson for Production January 14, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags: ,
add a comment

On the 19th of January, Kohsuke Kawaguchi, founder and key developer of Hudson, will walk you through an essential checklist that you can follow to ensure a smoothly-running Hudson production server. This presentation will take place as a free live webinar, you just need to register here.

More on CloudBees’ blog…

Hudson/Jenkins – some more context and thoughts January 12, 2011

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags: , , ,
5 comments

Andrew Bayer just posted a blog post on Hudson-labs.org with a proposal for renaming the Hudson project to “Jenkins”. Since Kohsuke Kawaguchi, founder of and lead contributor to the Hudson project, is part of CloudBees, and I’ve helped Andrew and Kohsuke bounce ideas, I wanted to share some more context and thoughts.

Each and every Open Source project has its own DNA, its own philosophy that gets established over time. Born in 2004, Hudson has had plenty of time to find its cruising altitude. Yet, after Kohsuke left ORCL, ORCL decided they didn’t necessarily liked the way the project was handled and asked for some changes to take place.

Let me clarify a key point upfront: was ORCL’s proposal stupid? No, not at all. Each and every project has a different DNA and I could very well see some FOSS projects for which such proposal would have made sense. Yet, the real question was not so much whether ORCL’s proposal could make sense for “some” project, the question was whether their proposal was making sense for Hudson specifically, a project with a well established DNA. And here the answer is a clear no.

So, why didn’t the community simply reject this proposal and move on? Anybody can request changes to any project, which doesn’t mean they’ll get accepted, right? Well, the difference here is that Hudson has an “asymmetry” in its community: one of its community members, ORCL, claims they “own” the brand and every contributor has to sign a contributor agreement granting them a copyright license. This “asymmetry” is frequent in many projects (JBoss, Glassfish, etc.) Yet, what is less frequent is when the “owner” of such asymmetry contributes very very little IP to the project (but receives a lot of free IP from the contributors through the CLA).

And so, the fear was that the Hudson project would be at the mercy of any random decision ORCL could take in the future.  And while I trust the person at ORCL with whom I’ve been interacting to not make any stupid or damaging decisions, at the end of the day this is not an agreement with a specific individual, this is an agreement with ORCL: people come and go.

So, what was the right decision? Was it be better for the community to keep investing its time and energy in the existing brand, and take the risk that it could fire back at some point in the future or was it better to “sanitize” the situation upfront and invest those efforts in building a new brand, hence removing the asymmetry that currently exists in the community?

What about ORCL now? They essentially have two choices. They can either keep working on their own project under the good old Hudson brand, or they can participate as an equal player in the newly branded community. Personally, I’d really like to see ORCL join forces with the rest of the community, as CloudBees will. I truly hope ORCL will join us, if not now, once the dust will have settled.

Last but not least, let me clarify one important thing: CloudBees has no intention whatsoever to replace ORCL as the new asymmetry in the Hudson/Jenkins community: CloudBees has no intention to own the trademark on the new brand, to own the IP of the project or anything else. Yet, what CloudBees has every intention to do is to further invest time and energy in contributing to Jenkins.

Onward,

 

Sacha

CloudBees becomes the PaaS innovation leader December 14, 2010

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags: ,
2 comments

Just a few weeks after announcing the acquisition of InfraDNA, the Hudson CI leader, and raising 4m USD from Matrix Partners and private investors, we are very proud to announce today the acquisition of Stax Networks.

Read more on CloudBees’ blog

CloudBees raises 4m USD from Matrix Partners November 29, 2010

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English.
Tags:
4 comments

Yet another great day at CloudBees: today, we are announcing that we have just raised 4m USD in a Series A round.

Investors include:

  • David Skok & Matrix Partners: I am very proud to have David as part of the team, he has done a terrific job at JBoss and he is not the kind of investor who only talks to you on quarterly board meetings, he is a  * doer* and truly proactively helps companies he invests in. You can read David’s remarkable blog posts on For Entrepreneurs.com.
  • Marc Fleury: I am also very proud to have my friend “marcf” onboard as an investor, especially since I know he is getting very active with his own venture: OpenRemote. (Funnily enough, both OpenRemote’s and CloudBees’ CEOs are located in Neuchâtel, Switzerland ;) )
  • Bob Bickel: Bob has been part of the CloudBees adventure since Day-One as a close advisor, so I am happy to see him invest in CloudBees – he wasn’t just being nice to me ;)
  • Michel Goossens: I met Michel back in the JBoss days when he joined the EMEA team to drive sales and marketing. Since then we have remained in close touch. Michel currently works at the fast growing Magento.

David and Bob will sit on CloudBees’ board. I’d also like to thank John Pearce for his help during that process.

Team, thank you for all of the work you’ve been doing to date, it has been a crazy pace – you are all amazing! Starting this week, new bees are joining our ranks, Lisa and Harpreet are going to help us on the marketing and product management fronts (happy kick-off in SFO!). And there is more coming, so stay tuned….

Onward,

Sacha

References:

CloudBees further accelerating! November 9, 2010

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags: , , ,
2 comments

Today, InfraDNA and CloudBees are announcing that they are joining forces. As part of this, InfraDNA founder and Hudson creator Kohsuke Kawaguchi joins CloudBees.

This is really a great milestone for CloudBees. You can read more about it:

Onward,

Sacha

CloudBees is hiring! Product Management & Marketing position October 8, 2010

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English.
Tags:
1 comment so far

CloudBees is hiring for a Product Management & Marketing position, you will find the detailed description in this document.

For you to be a fit, you are probably a rising star, much brighter than me, with high energy, extroverted and with a great personality. You are also a self-starter, you don’t need to be micro-managed, you are very comfortable with blogging and social media (your online activity will impress us). Oh, and obviously, you are familiar with the Java infrastructure world and you are convinced that the cloud is a massive paradigm shift.

If you didn’t run away, why don’t you send me an e-mail?

This is going to be a fun ride – don’t miss it!

Onward,

Sacha

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers