jump to navigation

The SpringForce/VMForce announcement April 29, 2010

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
1 comment so far

VMWare and Salesforce.com common announcement this week, VMForce, was really interesting.

First of all, it is yet another drum beat on the cloud march. The virtualization king (Market cap: 25B) and the CRM PaaS queen (Market cap: 11B) got together in what appeared to be a relatively ego-less offering: VMForce. One camp has the developer community; the other has the XaaS credibility (and is the biggest PaaS provider by far). This is not a lightweight marketing partnership: this is a pretty deep partnership under a unified brand umbrella.

This reinforces a message that will become a truism in the next few years: the cloud is new platform.

What is this really about? This announcement is about the PaaS leader, salesforce.com (CRM), offering itself a new programming model on top of its already successful platform, in order to extend its developer reach. CRM already has a strong set of services at its foundation: a relational-like multi-tenant database, pre-defined business schemas, REST APIs, etc. But all of those were only available from CRM’s own proprietary programming model. Thanks to VMForce, Spring users will have an easier path to Force.com.

But don’t be tricked, this doesn’t make VMForce the new “all-purpose”, generic PaaS offering: this remains a vertical-focused PaaS offering, aimed at Salesforce.com users. VMForce offers the advantages of its disadvantages: if you are a Salesforce.com user, this is going to boost your choices and flexibility by being able to leverage a substantial chunk of the Java ecosystem. Yet, if you are not a salesforce.com user (or if you are developing a non-CRM related application), VMForce represents a major lock-in into a platform that makes very little sense for your application.

So, who is the winner of that partnership, VMW or CRM?

The obvious beneficiary is Salesforce.com: it is already the PaaS market leader and through VMForce it keeps its lock-in while extending its developer reach. Brilliant. But does it necessarily mean that VMWare doesn’t benefit from that deal? While it is certainly a good financial deal for VMWare, it is almost secondary. The second beneficiary of this partnership is not the good old virtualization-focused VMWare, but VMWare’s middleware team: SpringSource. Acquisitions are never easy to pull correctly, especially when an operations-focused company acquires a development-focused one. Consequently, since SS’s acquisition last year, the middleware team has pretty much travelled in a black hole. Yet, VMForce (which should really be called SpringForce) will help SpringSource re-broadcast their message: they are after the cloud – and this is really what triggered their acquisition in the first place. So this announcement will definitively help restate their objective to the market.

But does it necessarily help SpringSource’s independent agenda as a PaaS provider? I am not at all convinced that it is the case. Lots of the PaaS’ hard problems have been solved in VMForce by simply leveraging Salesforce.com’s existing services. So, not only VMForce will not help SS’s independent agenda, it might actually represent a marketing/positioning challenge down the road when they’ll have to differentiate both offering.

Concerning the timing of the announcement, I was very surprised. It came out of nowhere, wasn’t announced as part of any cloud or developers conference, and the offering is not yet available, not even as a development offering. A beta developer release should be made available in the second half of 2010 with no known date for the GA production release. So, why so much hurry in the announcement? Both companies are known to be more reliable than MSFT’s vaporware PR.

Another element that hasn’t been announced yet is the pricing. This is probably fine for such an early announcement, but not even the pricing SCHEME was announced. And I bet there is a good reason for that: Salesforce.com is known to build by user (which has its own set of consequences and constraints for a PaaS) and VMWare is known to build by the deployment unit (CPU, core, VM, or whatever makes more sense). It will be interesting to see how they can resolve that pretty significant “philosophical gap”.

In any case, what I’ll remember from this partnership is how smart that was from Salesforce.com to make an ego-less move away from its own proprietary offering in order to extend its developer reach, and all this under a 3rd party branded offering, with limited impact on its own engineering roadmap. And congratulations to the SpringSource team for striking a partnership which impacts their mothership as a whole, this is probably their best way to escape from the acquisition black hole.

Onward,

Sacha

Google to accelerate Chrome’s adoption? April 14, 2010

Posted by Sacha in English, IT.
Tags:
8 comments

In the last few days, Google announced quite a few welcomed new features to their Google Apps offering, including better text/spreadsheet editors, an independent drawing tool, better Google Docs file sharing capabilities (those still remain pretty weak). That’s all great.

Yet, a postscriptum in their announcement also indicates that as of May 3 (read: first thing tomorrow morning in Enterprise-speak), the Google Mail/Calendar/Docs offline feature based on Google Gears will be disabled! That’s right, one of Google App’s key feature to simply be usable by many enterprises (i.e. being able to work offline) will be disabled in 3 weeks.

So, what are the options? Well, that is where things get interesting: Google promises that a solution based on the HTML 5 Web SQL Database spec should be available by then. So let’s look at the typical browsers out there and which are the ones supporting this feature:

Leading browsers not supporting this feature:

  • IE
  • Firefox
  • Safari

And since Opera is not officially supported on Google Apps, that leaves you with … Google Chrome.

Translation: “Dear valued customer, in 3 weeks we are going to abandon a key feature of Google Apps: offline files. Yet, if you want to still benefit from it, you have no other choice but roll-out our Google Chrome browser across your enterprise in that generous 3-weeks timeframe.

As much as I am a fan of Google Apps (and using it extensively on a daily basis), I am speechless about Google’s current move.

Onward,

Sacha

Back into the game April 1, 2010

Posted by Sacha in CloudBees, English, IT.
Tags:
21 comments

Flying BeeOne year ago, I left RHT with the clear plan to be actively doing nothing for some time. I did, but quickly realized I wasn’t good at it: it is not easy to relax when your brain keeps wondering what you could be doing next.

So I’ve started working with several startups, including eXo Platform and Wallix, but that only increased my desire to be back into the game.

And so today is the official start date of my new venture. I won’t tell you much about it at this point:  I’d rather wait until we have something real to show – that shouldn’t take long.

But who is “we”? Five highly talented engineers from ORCL, SUN and JBoss. Last but not least, my friend Bob Bickel accepted to be our advisor. Life is great.

So stay tuned…

Onward,

Sacha

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers